- #Stock photo sense android
- #Stock photo sense pro
- #Stock photo sense software
- #Stock photo sense license
- #Stock photo sense download
More pictures are taken every few months than were ever taken in the whole of the 20th century. Not everyone needs a direct pat on the back never mind hard cash for all the things they do.Īnd, Wikipedia, of course. We are social animals and like to feel useful to our society. There are all sorts of reasons why you and I do things for others for free. Yet, over the years, this attitude has changed and now Microsoft is a huge donor of open source software, and fully embraces it while still making a very healthy profit. Microsoft in particular was very much against it.
#Stock photo sense software
Some software businesses were initially very hostile to open source software, considering it a direct challenge to their business model of writing code for profit. And you know what, Google and Apple take that software and put it into their phones and sell it and make billions of dollars! We should all be so upset about this that CAPITAL LETTERS ARE REQUIRED.
#Stock photo sense android
Your Android and IPhones are only possible because of the countless of hours of software development by legions of open-source developers who all. *shakes head and walk away from computer*
#Stock photo sense license
really, THAT's going to stop someone? People won t make legal use of the images as per the license terms because the people who were stup[id enough to license their work under that license might get upset? That didn't stop Getty from selling "public domain" pictures provided to the library of congress by a generous photographer and then sending that same photographer a BILL FOR USE OF THE IMAGES!Īnd the community being VOCAL. However, the Creative Commons and Unsplash communities are pretty vocal in their dislike for this (not to mention it makes no economic sense, since the photo is already free). Legally, the CC0 license allows you to sell the photos posted on Unsplash. Think it doesn't happen? It happens on Getty, it happens on IStock. you have no guarantee that the person who uploaded the file there is actually the original copyright holder and as such you open yourself to some serious liability if you end up using an image that has been stolen and uploaded without the copyright owners knowledge or consent.
There are also some serious issues with businesses who want to use these free images. you released the images under a license that allows for that type of use you idiots!!! It's like when Flickr tried to sell prints of CC licensed images on its network and the people who had released the images under those CC licenses bent crazy "THEY CAN'T DO THAT!!!" Uhm, yes they can. that means also moral rights (where applicable). INCLUDING ALL RELATED AND NEIGHBORING RIGHTS. "The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law." sell them on calendars, in photo books, as stock! Without a dime going to them or even any credit! I'm not sure these photographers understand what that ACTUALLY implies.
#Stock photo sense download
Huh? So I can grab a high-res download of any of the images on this website and throw my logo on it and the artist doesn't care? The image means that little to them? Just for fun, I adjusted the below free image so we can all have a little giggle. Blogs, art, book covers, t-shirts, and more - paid or unpaid - they’re all allowed under the license. The Unsplash license allows for photographs to be used for any purpose - both commercial and personal. A lot of the work I'm seeing throughout these sites is pretty good, too good to just be throwing them out there for whomever to use in whatever media they choose. I'm not kidding! See the excerpt from FREE stock photo site Unsplash below.
#Stock photo sense pro
Out of the gate, as a professional photographer, this totally bums me out. I don't need any more photographers offering up their services for FREE! I think it's universally understood that too many are already underbidding and offering up their services beneath a fair value. It seems as though this method is affecting our perceived value to the consumer, driving down the expected cost of the pro photographer who has accrued the expertise, knowledge and top-notch gear it takes to do what we do.Īnother astounding fact is that most of the sites do not require that you even credit the image they simply suggest that you do. So I'm going to do just that (obviously). Totally Free ZERO Creative Commons Zero Image by - Tim Marshall
0 kommentar(er)
